<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Veritosity</title>
	<link>http://veritosity.com</link>
	<description>Please, just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A very special blog post: Liveblogging the Ford/Kos debate by Ned</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>Hey Cheryl,

It was good meeting you too. I agree that Arshad and Kos were both very respectful - I was referring more to the heckling from the audience, and that one guy from Long Island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Cheryl,</p>
<p>It was good meeting you too. I agree that Arshad and Kos were both very respectful - I was referring more to the heckling from the audience, and that one guy from Long Island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conflict of interests by Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-935</guid>
		<description>OMG! How completely stupid are they at the DNC? Is that a joke?

Yeah, with the whole FISA thing it really reeks. I would rather they skip the convention and all that wasted money and give people things like, I don't know, healthcare!

They could easily get progressive sponsors. No reason to sell out like corporate W's.

I heard in one session that the Congress critters who voted against FISA the first time but for it the second got larger campaign donations from the Telecoms. Maybe AT  &#38;T was just securing the support of the sellout democrats in the future, you know, for other legislation where they will take away our constitutional rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! How completely stupid are they at the DNC? Is that a joke?</p>
<p>Yeah, with the whole FISA thing it really reeks. I would rather they skip the convention and all that wasted money and give people things like, I don&#8217;t know, healthcare!</p>
<p>They could easily get progressive sponsors. No reason to sell out like corporate W&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I heard in one session that the Congress critters who voted against FISA the first time but for it the second got larger campaign donations from the Telecoms. Maybe AT  &amp;T was just securing the support of the sellout democrats in the future, you know, for other legislation where they will take away our constitutional rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A very special blog post: Liveblogging the Ford/Kos debate by Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I didn't pick up on the hostility. I thought both Arshad and Kos were on the mark with their tone and not disrespectful. Nothing I hate more than people who say f#$k you to me with a smile on their face which is what Ford and his kind (DLC Corporatists) do. I would much rather have the directness and honesty instead of that passive aggressive stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I didn&#8217;t pick up on the hostility. I thought both Arshad and Kos were on the mark with their tone and not disrespectful. Nothing I hate more than people who say f#$k you to me with a smile on their face which is what Ford and his kind (DLC Corporatists) do. I would much rather have the directness and honesty instead of that passive aggressive stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A very special blog post: Liveblogging the Ford/Kos debate by Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Oh, no Ned. Have to disagree on the sandwiches. My chicken one had no chicken so I tried a veggie and it had brown sprouts. Both were stale and too much bread. You guys clearly are not foodies, lol.

It was great meeting you at NN. I hope you had a good time.

Love the liveblog and your comments are spot on about Ford. I did one too but not nearly as good. If you have others, cross post on  Blog for America. They have been asking to  hear from scholarship winners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, no Ned. Have to disagree on the sandwiches. My chicken one had no chicken so I tried a veggie and it had brown sprouts. Both were stale and too much bread. You guys clearly are not foodies, lol.</p>
<p>It was great meeting you at NN. I hope you had a good time.</p>
<p>Love the liveblog and your comments are spot on about Ford. I did one too but not nearly as good. If you have others, cross post on  Blog for America. They have been asking to  hear from scholarship winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conflict of interests by Ned</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Corey - The problem with that, as Lawrence Lessig would point out, is that accepting corporate sponsorship at all undermines the public's trust in you as long as it's possible that the appearance of that sponsorship influencing legislation still exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey - The problem with that, as Lawrence Lessig would point out, is that accepting corporate sponsorship at all undermines the public&#8217;s trust in you as long as it&#8217;s possible that the appearance of that sponsorship influencing legislation still exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conflict of interests by Corey</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Really the best answer is to take money (or corporate sponsorship) and do what you want regardless.  But taking it after cutting a deal for telecom immunity is just bad PR work.

I just like the idea of cheerfully accepting money and then pretending as if it wasn't a donation to buy some influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really the best answer is to take money (or corporate sponsorship) and do what you want regardless.  But taking it after cutting a deal for telecom immunity is just bad PR work.</p>
<p>I just like the idea of cheerfully accepting money and then pretending as if it wasn&#8217;t a donation to buy some influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conflict of interests by Ghazala Khan</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghazala Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/21/conflict-of-interests/#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Interview Request

Hello Dear and Respected,
I hope you are fine and carrying on the great work you have been doing for the Internet surfers. I am Ghazala Khan from The Pakistani Spectator (TPS), We at TPS throw a candid look on everything happening in and for Pakistan in the world. We are trying to contribute our humble share in the webosphere. Our aim is to foster peace, progress and harmony with passion.
 
We at TPS are carrying out a new series of interviews with the notable passionate bloggers, writers, and webmasters. In that regard, we would like to interview you, if you don't mind. Please send us your approval for your interview at my email address "ghazala.khi at gmail.com", so that I could send you the Interview questions. We would be extremely grateful.

regards.
 
Ghazala Khan
The Pakistani Spectator
http://www.pakspectator.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interview Request</p>
<p>Hello Dear and Respected,<br />
I hope you are fine and carrying on the great work you have been doing for the Internet surfers. I am Ghazala Khan from The Pakistani Spectator (TPS), We at TPS throw a candid look on everything happening in and for Pakistan in the world. We are trying to contribute our humble share in the webosphere. Our aim is to foster peace, progress and harmony with passion.</p>
<p>We at TPS are carrying out a new series of interviews with the notable passionate bloggers, writers, and webmasters. In that regard, we would like to interview you, if you don&#8217;t mind. Please send us your approval for your interview at my email address &#8220;ghazala.khi at gmail.com&#8221;, so that I could send you the Interview questions. We would be extremely grateful.</p>
<p>regards.</p>
<p>Ghazala Khan<br />
The Pakistani Spectator<br />
<a href="http://www.pakspectator.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pakspectator.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invasion becomes re-invasion by Re-invasion becomes just regular invasion again &#124; Veritosity</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/19/invasion-becomes-re-invasion/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Re-invasion becomes just regular invasion again &#124; Veritosity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/19/invasion-becomes-re-invasion/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>[...] Invasion becomes re-invasion  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Invasion becomes re-invasion  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An even very specialer blog post: Nancy Pelosi/AL FREAKING GORE event liveblog by Go ask Nancy; I think she knows &#124; Innermost Parts</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/19/an-even-very-specialer-blog-post-nancy-pelosi-event-liveblog/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Go ask Nancy; I think she knows &#124; Innermost Parts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/19/an-even-very-specialer-blog-post-nancy-pelosi-event-liveblog/#comment-919</guid>
		<description>[...] on for more questions and answeers. Ned Resnikoff is also liveblogging the event.  Q; Why not inherent contempt? A; Backhanded talk. Pelosi conflates holding Miers in contemptwith [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on for more questions and answeers. Ned Resnikoff is also liveblogging the event.  Q; Why not inherent contempt? A; Backhanded talk. Pelosi conflates holding Miers in contemptwith [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A very special blog post: Liveblogging the Ford/Kos debate by Markos-Harold Ford Netroots Nation Liveblogging &#124; Innermost Parts</title>
		<link>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Markos-Harold Ford Netroots Nation Liveblogging &#124; Innermost Parts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://veritosity.com/2008/07/18/a-very-special-blog-post-liveblogging-the-fordkos-debate/#comment-916</guid>
		<description>[...] a more amusing take on the whole thing, check out my friend Ned Resnikoff&#8217;s liveblog at Veritosity. Much more concise and easy to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a more amusing take on the whole thing, check out my friend Ned Resnikoff&#8217;s liveblog at Veritosity. Much more concise and easy to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
